Should i commit

Perhaps you live with physical or mental health symptoms that affect your quality of life. Giving up can feel easier when life seems pointless. But just as pain keeps you from seeing solutions, it can also pull the joy and significance from the things that used to matter. Your life does have meaning, though. Challenge yourself to discover this meaning — or create it for yourself. Consider skills, abilities, and other things you take pride in. Think about your connections with others or goals you once had.

No reason is too small. Pets provide meaning, too. The pain you cause can make you believe the people you hurt are better off without you, which can intensify suicidal thinking. Let this be proof that they care, and let it give you strength to apologize, make amends, or work on repairing the friendship. Not everyone knows anger and irritability often show up as a symptom of depression or other mental health conditions.

You might see yourself as a terrible person. When I made too many mistakes, when no one wanted to be around me any longer, when the mess I made of my life was too big to clean up, I would reassure myself I could just end it. But the longer I put it off, the more clearly I could see how to repair those mistakes and make better choices going forward. Those goals gave me a purpose, something to work toward, and noticing my own growth gave me even more strength to keep going.

My lowest point came after a serious breakup. If you need to make larger changes that might interfere with other peoples' work, make a branch so you can commit without disturbing anyone else. It also depends on the SCM system you're using.

With centralized systems such as svn or cvs, committing is more costly, and it affects everyone. Branching partially solves this issue, but because it happens on the server, it can be painfully slow, and merging can be cumbersome. So with centralized SCM's, there is often a more careful culture, where you only commit once you've done significant amounts of work. As for the add-on: Please, please don't do that.

If you're using DVCS like Mercurial or Git, you should commit to your local repository whenever you've done significant amount of work. However, only push it to shared repository only after it's working, self contained change that has been tested.

For non-distributed VCS like eg. SVN same logic applies, instead of local repository use private branch, instead of push — merge to main branch. I know of people who commit as often as every 90 seconds. It seems to work for them.

I have experimented with committing every time I save a file, which is probably more often than 90 seconds. Today, I probably commit about every 15 minutes. A VCS that allows you to squash multiple commits into one and that allows local commits like git makes this a lot easier. How often should you commit?

Hard to say, but probably more often than you are now. Keep committing more and more often, find a point that feels like it's absurdly too often, and then back off a bit. Chances are you'll end up with something reasonable. You measure a product's development based on value delivered to its users. There is no other accurate measurement.

Each commit should do exactly one of the following:. Also when working in branches, commits must go to a branch that is more apt. Two commits should not have the same commit message implying similar changes but in different branches as it confuses the collaborators.

A better way is commit to main branch and merge to the feature branch. Regarding measuring project's progress based on commits, it is possible if Refactoring commits and Bug fixing commits are not taken into account.

And to answer your add-on questions - NO!! Has it been successfully system tested or even unit tested. Just because it is committed - it doesn't mean it is production ready. As a add-on: Is it a correct practice to measure a project's development based on its commits? There was a daily WTF on why that is a horrid idea. My general rule of thumb on committing code is to check in when I have completed a chunk of code and it compiles. Chunk is not really defined. If it's a small task, I might not check in until I'm done it.

If it's larger, I might check in after each logical portion is completed. In this case want to delay publishing commits until later, but you want to keep working and making commits until then.

You expect you'll have to merge in changes from coworkers. This is a very big context switch from working on your code, and similarly to the situation above, you might want to delay this until you're done with your task so you can stay focused on it.

This, in fact, tends to be a very common problem in Subversion teams - the mentality that "merging is annoying" that makes people do one commit with all their day's work when they leave, without really resolving conflicts properly.

Since resolving conflicts is easier with "nice" commits with a clear purpose, this creates a vicious cycle. You're contributing to a project by emailing patches.

This is how the Linux kernel used to be developped, and maybe still is. This requirement in fact influenced Git's design early on. You're making very frequent commits and maybe pushing them to a private remote repository for backup purposes. However, you want to use git rebase to clean them up before publishing them - say, bundling a new feature with fixes to bugs found in the initial implementation into a single commit.

A nitty-gritty reason: you're committing to a feature branch that doesn't even exist on the remote server yet so there's nothing to push to. Which is desired as well, feature branches don't necessarily need to be published widely. Basically, Git strives for maximal flexibility in order to support arbitrarily complex workflows. Now, you might not need this, in which case you can easily use GUIs or small shell scripts that will combine the stuff you need.

The above answer is great, but there is one more important reason that I do this - Sometimes, while doing local testing on one branch, I would like to have custom configurations, but these configs should not be sent over to the actual remote repository.

In that case, committing it locally has helped me keep that configuration safe. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? The urge to live is very human — but so is the desire to stop pain. Someone may see suicide as the only option to make pain stop, though they may spend a lot of time questioning their decision, even agonizing over the pain others will feel.

They need urgent support from a trained professional. Most hotlines offer support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Trained counselors will listen with compassion and offer guidance on helpful resources near you. Crystal Raypole has previously worked as a writer and editor for GoodTherapy. Her fields of interest include Asian languages and literature, Japanese translation, cooking, natural sciences, sex positivity, and mental health.

Wondering what to say to someone with depression? Express your concern, listen, but avoid giving advice. Individuals with depression need to know….